Mauricio’s response – Crawford

I found Crawford’s reading (provided by Nance) stimulating. I was wondering recently about scales of strength and/or complexity in visual communication and I had: (1) understanding – basic comprehension of information/diagrams, (2) persuasion – conviction and acceptance of information/visual rhetoric, and (3) engagement – motivation and personalization of information/becoming active participant in communication. I was just doing this to organize a project, but I know is kind of naïve and needs further exploration.

After Crawford’s reading, I think I missed what he called “seeing clear, or unselfishly”. Now I am wondering how design could create (if possible) visual information that induces “attentive openness” in users/receivers to seek things and expect misunderstanding. This goes beyond understanding, acceptance, or personalization, and should start with designers themselves. We might fail if we are not involved in “seeing clearly” before designing.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s